Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONZALEZ Veronika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
| 2 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 3 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 3 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 5 | GONG Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 6 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% | |
| 6 | NIU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 8 | NANDA Maanika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 10 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% | |
| 11 | LEE Grace | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 12 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% | |
| 13 | HILD Anya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 5% | |
| 14 | XU Elaine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 15 | CHAU Zoey | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 18 | SEO Kaitlyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Grace | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | ZONG Eliane | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 23 | MUNSHI Ridhima | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | |
| 24 | KATZ Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
| 25 | KIM Eunjae | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 26 | JUNG Elise | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | PIENKOWSKI Olivia | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | JOHN Sophia | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | MALUKI Nia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 30 | YOUNG Sienna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG Keira | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | MOFFITT Charlotte | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | LIAO Amber | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | NEGROIU Mara | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | KARAVAS Lucy | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | SPIESS Linnea | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | BAO Amelia | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | SAGER Bianca | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | SMITH Genevieve | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | CHI Alicia | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | LAU Angela | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | LEE Elise | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | DIBADJ Ava | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 46 | CHANG Grace | 100% | 69% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | CHEN Chloe | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 48 | PASSMAN Caroline | 100% | 98% | 80% | 29% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | GOLEN Grace | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.