Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 2 | TAYCHER Aaron | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 46% | |
| 3 | MERMEGAS Alexander | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Royce | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 5 | DAI Zihou | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 5 | SONG Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 7 | MIAO Heqi | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 8 | CHANG Timothy | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | TITOV Zachary | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 43% | 10% | |
| 10 | CHAN Ewan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 11 | LAU Kyrus | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
| 12 | CUSSON William | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 13 | MHLEY Gavin | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 14 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 15 | BROOKS Drake | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
| 16 | ULYSSE Jacob | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | LEE Blake | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 15% | |
| 18 | SO Morgan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 19 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 20 | FOUX Jonathan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 21 | WANG Harrison | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | HOWARTH Hayes | 1% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 23 | LEIGH Brayden | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | BURENKOV Matthew | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | LEE Jason | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | AVERY Marcus | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | WAXLER Alex | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 28 | EARLEY Jack | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | VISH Manyu | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | OGELE Joshua | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 31 | SHAPIRO Leo | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | ALLEN Parker | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LI Jayden | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | DATTILIO Aidan | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | TANJGA Luka | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KIM Mason | 5% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | YAO John | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | VITALE Mateo | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 39 | SEARS Max | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 40 | FIROOZI Alex | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | O'KEEFE Brody | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | HAGN Maximilian | < 1% | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | BALBALE Zayd | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.