Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 2 | TAYCHER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
| 3 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 5 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 5 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% | |
| 7 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 8 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 10% | |
| 10 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 11 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 12 | CUSSON William | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | MHLEY Gavin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 14 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 15 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | 1% | |
| 16 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | LEE Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% | |
| 18 | SO Morgan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 19 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 20 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 21 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 7% | - | |
| 23 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 24 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | LEE Jason | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | WAXLER Alex | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | EARLEY Jack | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | OGELE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 1% | |
| 31 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 32 | ALLEN Parker | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LI Jayden | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | DATTILIO Aidan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | TANJGA Luka | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KIM Mason | 100% | 95% | 62% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | YAO John | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | VITALE Mateo | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | SEARS Max | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 40 | FIROOZI Alex | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | HAGN Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 43 | BALBALE Zayd | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.