Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
| 2 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 3 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 51% | 12% |
| 3 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 5 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 6 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% |
| 7 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 8 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 9 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 10 | FIELD Julianna | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 11 | HAO Danica | - | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 3% |
| 12 | BERGEL Daphne | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 13 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 4% | 30% | 44% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | WANG Joanna | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 15 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 16 | ROY Layla | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
| 17 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% | |
| 18 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 19 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
| 20 | WANG Sabrina | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 22 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 23 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 24 | FIELD Elizabeth | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | ZHANG Selena | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 48% | 5% |
| 27 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% |
| 28 | ZELDIN Nadia | 1% | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | WANG Amabel | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | SHENG Katherine | - | 5% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | WANG Yudi | 2% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | FENG Audrey | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YANG Emma | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 34 | BING Charlotte | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | - |
| 35 | YU Jane | - | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 36 | BABIAC Julia | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | KIM Claire | 6% | 47% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | BASILE Gianna | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | POPOVA Polina | 7% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | LI Katerina | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LEVY Avery | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 11% | 40% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WAN Celine | 31% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 15% | 45% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 45 | REZA Fukaina | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 4% | 39% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | HUANG Sophie | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | LAWRENCE Nia | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | CHEN Sophie | 1% | 14% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | TSE Isabel | 35% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHENG Isa | 1% | 19% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ARRAIANO Olivia R. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BRODY Coco | 45% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | KUMAR Ishana | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | OTTERMAN Jenna | 88% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 56 | THOMAS Eliana | 8% | 36% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | BELISTRI Isabella | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | LUNEAU Isabel | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.