Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 2 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 3 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 12% |
| 3 | FENG Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 5 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 6 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% |
| 7 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 8 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 9 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | |
| 10 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
| 11 | HAO Danica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 3% |
| 12 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 13 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 22% | 3% | |
| 14 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 15 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 16 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
| 17 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 31% | |
| 18 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 11% |
| 19 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 20 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 22 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 4% |
| 23 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 24 | FIELD Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 5% |
| 27 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% |
| 28 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 29 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 34 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | - |
| 35 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 36 | BABIAC Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | KIM Claire | 100% | 94% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | POPOVA Polina | 100% | 93% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | LI Katerina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 100% | 89% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WAN Celine | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 100% | 85% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 45 | REZA Fukaina | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 96% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | HUANG Sophie | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | LAWRENCE Nia | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | TSE Isabel | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 99% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ARRAIANO Olivia R. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BRODY Coco | 100% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | KUMAR Ishana | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 56 | OTTERMAN Jenna | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 56 | THOMAS Eliana | 100% | 92% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | BELISTRI Isabella | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | LUNEAU Isabel | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.