Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
2 | CAI Ilana | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
3 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 61% |
3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
5 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 61% |
6 | LI Savannah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
7 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
8 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 55% | |
9 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
10 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 2% |
11 | LIN Yunong | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
12 | LIU Yino | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
13 | YOUM Amelia | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 1% | - | |
14 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
15 | CAO Amelie | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
16 | YIN Chloe | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
17 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | 3% | 19% | 54% | 23% | |
18 | ZHANG Zoey | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
19 | BAULIN Zoya | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
20 | AGUIAR Leala | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
21 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | PAEK Mila | 5% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
23 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 5% |
24 | BO Iris | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
25 | LI Christina | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
26 | JI Dora YuanDao | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | - | |
27 | LEO Jenna | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
28 | ZHU Ella | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
29 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
30 | GE Deanna | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
31 | SHANG Arianna | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
32 | LIANG Jasmine | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | LI Doreen | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
34 | DONG Katelyn | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | PARK Eloisa | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
36 | LAU Victoria | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | HUDSON Sophie | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
38 | WU Annie | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | - | - | |
39 | BALMER Zoe | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | SPEZAKIS Hypatia | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
41 | WEI Heidi | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.