Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 2 | CAI Ilana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 3 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 3 | KRAHE Annika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 5 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% |
| 6 | LI Savannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
| 7 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 8 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% | |
| 9 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | SHIN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 11 | LIN Yunong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 12 | LIU Yino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 13 | YOUM Amelia | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 15 | CAO Amelie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 16 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | ORRINGER Lottie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 23% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Zoey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 19 | BAULIN Zoya | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 20 | AGUIAR Leala | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | PAEK Mila | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | HAFEZ Sahar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 5% |
| 24 | BO Iris | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LI Christina | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | JI Dora YuanDao | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | LEO Jenna | 100% | 91% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | ZHU Ella | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | GE Deanna | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 31 | SHANG Arianna | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | LIANG Jasmine | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LI Doreen | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | DONG Katelyn | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 35 | PARK Eloisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | LAU Victoria | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | HUDSON Sophie | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | WU Annie | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | - | - | |
| 39 | BALMER Zoe | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SPEZAKIS Hypatia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 41 | WEI Heidi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.