Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jayden | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | KIM Henry | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | LUO Alexander | D V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | WANG-SONG Evan | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | SONG Aidan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | HAN Keyi | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 8 | ZHAI Junqi | D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 9 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 10 | SHAPIRO Samuel | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | NOOL Alexander | V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | BEYER Timothy | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | ZHANG Shuhao | V V V D D V | V D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 14 | GIORDANO Zach | V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | NOOL Aaron | V D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | FOGEL Jake | V D V D D | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | TOPRANI Valmik | V V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | WHITE Jackson | V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 19 | BRESLAV Asher | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 20 | CHEN Daniel | D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | SHEYDIN Barry | V D D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 22 | WILLIAMS Gavin | V D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | D D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | ZINCHUK Yuri | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | YU David | V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | YOON Jonathan | V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | CHO Adrian | D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | KATS Brandon | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | TANG Milo | D V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 30 | SMITH Theo | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 31 | MCGANN Grant | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | SHI Evan | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | RICHARDSON Matthew | D D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 34 | WANG Marcus | D V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | ROFINO Samuel | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 36 | MCGINLEY Felix | D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 37 | ARMSTRONG Payson | D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 38 | JIN Derek | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 39 | PARKER Wilson | D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 40 | YU George | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 41 | GENG Michael | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 42 | MUELLER Travis | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 43 | LEE Ryan | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 44 | SANTANA Sebastian | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 45 | LANDMAN Martin | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.