Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jayden | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | KIM Henry | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 3 | LUO Alexander | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 3 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 5 | SONG Aidan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 6 | CAFASSO Alexander | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 7 | HAN Keyi | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | ZHAI Junqi | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% | |
| 9 | SINGLETON Aman | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 10 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% | |
| 11 | NOOL Alexander | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 26% | 3% | |
| 12 | BEYER Timothy | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | ZHANG Shuhao | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | GIORDANO Zach | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 15 | NOOL Aaron | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | FOGEL Jake | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | TOPRANI Valmik | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 18 | WHITE Jackson | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | BRESLAV Asher | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | CHEN Daniel | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | |
| 21 | SHEYDIN Barry | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 24 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | YU David | 8% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | YOON Jonathan | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | CHO Adrian | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | KATS Brandon | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | TANG Milo | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | SMITH Theo | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | MCGANN Grant | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SHI Evan | 10% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WANG Marcus | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | ROFINO Samuel | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MCGINLEY Felix | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 37 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 38 | JIN Derek | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | PARKER Wilson | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 40 | YU George | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | GENG Michael | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | MUELLER Travis | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LEE Ryan | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | SANTANA Sebastian | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | LANDMAN Martin | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.