Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOUGLAS Rhys | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | |
| 2 | ROHRLACK Charles (Charlie) F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 3 | WANG William | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 11% | - | |
| 3 | LIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 5 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% |
| 6 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 7 | HERNANDEZ Stanton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
| 8 | DIACOS Jordan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | |
| 9 | ZIRKLE James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 6% |
| 10 | KIM Kendrick | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 11 | LO Maxim L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 12 | AKS Ari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 75% | 15% | |
| 13 | ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 54% | 5% |
| 15 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 17 | WANG Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 18 | CHINWAH Kaden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
| 19 | LAUDON Konrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 20 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 21 | ISSA Naoum P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | VEDRE Neil | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% | - | - |
| 23 | BARNES William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 24 | ALTSCHUL James | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 25 | FARIDI Imran | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | KAUFFMAN Alex | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | HENDERSON Jack | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GAJKOWSKI Leif | 100% | 75% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | TAN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | PERRY Gwydion | 100% | 85% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | DEGA Brandon | 100% | 66% | 16% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | MARTIN William | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | BROCKMEYER Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 34 | UNG Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
| 35 | CUNNINGHAM-SNELSON Aahil | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | HILL Quillan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 26% | 1% | |
| 37 | BAILEY Conner | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 38 | SHARP Asher | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 1% | |
| 40 | SANABRIA Enrique | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 1% | |
| 41 | WAGNER Elijah | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 42 | HUA Michael | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 8% | - | - |
| 43 | BROWN Oscar | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | BARROWS Hunter | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | LU Jiachen | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | JOHNSON Eli | 100% | 89% | 46% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | SALMAN Hamzah | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LIU Alvin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | PARKILA Lukas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 50 | WANG William M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 51 | XIONG Zerui | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 52 | PARADIS Emmit | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | TURNER Benjamin | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Jeffrey | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | JI Eric | 100% | 95% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | KIM David | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | RICKERT Michael A. | 100% | 97% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | FORTI Paul | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | KO Samuel | 100% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.