Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | REEVES Liam | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
2 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 12% |
3 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
3 | WONG Antonio | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 50% | 19% |
5 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
6 | NUNNINK Phillip W. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 55% |
7 | LU Yikai | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
8 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | - | 1% | 10% | 50% | 39% | |
9 | SANTOS Carlos R. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 35% | 6% |
10 | FANHAIJI Musitafa | - | - | 2% | 20% | 52% | 26% | |
11 | LEUNG Ethan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
12 | JI Aidan Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 32% |
13 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
14 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% |
15 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% | |
16 | ZHAO Adam | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% |
17 | PAI Lakshan K. | - | - | - | 8% | 49% | 42% | |
18 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
19 | DORE Davis | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
20 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | - | 5% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 2% |
21 | CHOE Jayden K. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
22 | CHEZ Nolan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
23 | CROOM Tucker | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | ARATA Connor | 1% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
25 | XIAO Bowen | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
26 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
27 | ZHAO Bowen | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
28 | MCKINLEY Luke | 1% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 5% | - | |
29 | BOYKO Miles | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
30 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
31 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
32 | DUNLAP Ian | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
33 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | MARTIN William | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
35 | RAJPAL Alastair | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 18% | 2% | |
36 | WILKINS Mateo | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
37 | WAKEHAM Paul | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
38 | TAN Xinlai | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
39 | MATLIN Mark | 24% | 51% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | LIU Yinhong | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
41 | SMITH Cooper | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
42 | KENNEDY Michael | 5% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 1% | - | |
43 | IRISH Thomas | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | HEYBOER Jason | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | NAIDL Josiah | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
46 | MAVANI Krishna | 3% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
47 | ENOIU Patrick | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
48 | HOWLAND Jonas | 4% | 26% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
49 | HREHOCIK Matthew | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
50 | WAKEHAM Timothy | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - | |
51 | MENASCO Juliun | 12% | 40% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
52 | COLEMAN Marcus | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | |
53 | MARTIN Dexter | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
54 | ZMUDA Aiden | 27% | 51% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | NAZARIO Dominic | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
56 | GNEUHS Sam | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
57 | REAUME Nate | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | 1% | 17% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | FINDLER Zachary | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
60 | LAKAS Darius | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | HAN Ray | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
61 | HASHMI Mushaf | 10% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
63 | NI Aaric | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
63 | LIN Connor | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
65 | ZHANG Alexander | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
66 | MORRISON Eddie | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
67 | REECE Oliver | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
68 | DAVIS Benjamin | 53% | 41% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.