Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MICHAELSEN Emily | - | - | 1% | 15% | 47% | 37% |
| 2 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 6% | 44% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | LIU Sophia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 5 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 6 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 7 | YU Lauren C. | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
| 8 | ROY Layla | - | 4% | 29% | 47% | 20% | |
| 9 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 47% |
| 10 | WANG Chloe | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
| 11 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 12 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 10% |
| 13 | CHARALEL Jessica | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 14 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 2% | 23% | 50% | 25% |
| 15 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 7% | 39% | 41% | 12% | |
| 16 | TOBIN Brean | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 3% | 22% | 51% | 24% |
| 18 | CHEN Jasmine | 1% | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Jasmine | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 20 | ROHRING Anna L. | 40% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHOU Sophia | 11% | 43% | 40% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 6% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | PAULUS Isabella | 23% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LEE Kaitlyn | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 27 | ZHU Elise | 19% | 48% | 30% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | KUTTIKAT Sanjana | 20% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | LENZ Zoe N. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | PARK Jacqueline | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SHTROM Uma A. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | CHEN Miley | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | KIES Daniela | 9% | 55% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | SHAH Aanya | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | JIN wendy | 42% | 45% | 12% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.