Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MICHAELSEN Emily | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LIU Sophia | V D D V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 5 | KOKES Gwendolen | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | CHO Rebecca H. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 7 | YU Lauren C. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | ROY Layla | D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | ORVANANOS Anice | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | WANG Chloe | V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SHMAY Anastasia | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | LIU Angel(Daying) | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | CHARALEL Jessica | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | EYER Hailey M. | V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | LIN Victoria T. | V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | TOBIN Brean | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | ZHENG Julie | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 18 | CHEN Jasmine | V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 19 | WANG Jasmine | D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 20 | ROHRING Anna L. | D V D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 21 | ZHOU Sophia | D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 22 | MARKOVSKY Nina | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | PAULUS Isabella | V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 24 | LEE Kaitlyn | D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 25 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 26 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 27 | ZHU Elise | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 28 | KUTTIKAT Sanjana | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 29 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 29 | PARK Jacqueline | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | SHTROM Uma A. | D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 32 | CHEN Miley | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | KIES Daniela | D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 34 | SHAH Aanya | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 35 | JIN wendy | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.