SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOREN George | - | 2% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 27% | 9% |
| 2 | SHAPIRO Leo | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | ALUF William | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 3 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 5 | ISAYENKO Daniel | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 6 | HAGN Maximilian | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 7 | WANG Russell | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 8 | PARK Sean | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 9 | NARAYAN Rishi | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 10 | MAKLIN David | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 1% |
| 11 | SOLEJ miles | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 12 | HU Simon | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 13 | BURCH III Andrew | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 14 | ZHANG Howard | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 15 | LIUZHANG Ben | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | PARK Layne | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 19 | LI Jayden | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | TERENTIEV Michael | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SUH Jordan | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | CHAN Brady | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | KRISHNARASA Aiyann | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 24 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | GILBERT Ari | 6% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 26 | JACOBS Eitan | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | YING Ryan | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | SABINO Bennett | 2% | 11% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | SUH Ethan | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 30 | LEE Aiden | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | FRANTZ Ken | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 32 | KNOBEL Benjamin | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | ZHAO Alexander | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | WONG Jacob | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MUSA Roman | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 36 | FARRIS Peter | 4% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | PARRISH Lucien | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | DAMBAL Evan | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Mark | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | XU Jayden | < 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 41 | KAGAN Jacob | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.