SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOREN George | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | SHAPIRO Leo | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | ALUF William | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | ISAYENKO Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | HAGN Maximilian | D D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 7 | WANG Russell | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 8 | PARK Sean | V V V D D D | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 9 | NARAYAN Rishi | V V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 10 | MAKLIN David | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 11 | SOLEJ miles | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | HU Simon | V V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | BURCH III Andrew | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | ZHANG Howard | V V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | LIUZHANG Ben | V V D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 16 | ZALETAEV Jacob | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | PARK Layne | V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | D V V V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 19 | LI Jayden | V V V V D D | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 20 | TERENTIEV Michael | V D V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 21 | SUH Jordan | V V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | CHAN Brady | D V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 23 | KRISHNARASA Aiyann | V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | RAJMOHAN Syon | D D V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 25 | GILBERT Ari | D V V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 26 | JACOBS Eitan | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | YING Ryan | D V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | SABINO Bennett | D V D V D D | V | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | SUH Ethan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | LEE Aiden | D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | FRANTZ Ken | D D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | KNOBEL Benjamin | D D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 33 | ZHAO Alexander | V D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 34 | WONG Jacob | D D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 35 | MUSA Roman | D D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 36 | FARRIS Peter | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | PARRISH Lucien | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 38 | DAMBAL Evan | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 39 | ZHANG Mark | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 40 | XU Jayden | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 41 | KAGAN Jacob | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.