SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KO Caleb | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
2 | TANG Royce | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
3 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
3 | MO Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
5 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
6 | KUO Phineas | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
7 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
8 | HUYNH Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
9 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
10 | HUANG Jinyao | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
11 | CHANG Parker | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
12 | ZHAO Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
13 | ULYSSE Jacob | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
14 | KAYE Ben | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
15 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
16 | LU Hansen | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
17 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
18 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 8% |
18 | XIAN kevin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
20 | FREL Vincent | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
21 | CHEN kenneth | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
22 | AHMAD Uzayr | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 6% |
23 | BEYDOUN Sam | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
24 | ZHENG Austin | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
25 | BRAIZINHA David | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
26 | SHAW eric | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
27 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
28 | BAS Jonathan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | SIU Max | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 6% | 1% |
30 | LEE Kyle | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
31 | MA Matthew | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 34% | 10% |
32 | LIU jeremy | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | LIN Qianzhong | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
34 | HART-SYED declan | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
35 | ZHANG Ethan | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
36 | TANG Michael | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | SHEN Lucas | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
38 | JOHN Meru | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | LEE Aeden | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
40 | HAN Jiaren | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
41 | PITERBARG Lev | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | MCLENDON Mateo | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
43 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
44 | HARRY Ryan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | YOUM Tyson | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | DAWSON Myer | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
47 | WEZWICK Luke | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
48 | PARISH-MORRIS Jay | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
49 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | CHOI Hunter | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 2% | - |
51 | HUYNH Kaleb | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
52 | CAO Joshua | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
52 | HUANG Marcus | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | SPERBER Miles | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
55 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
55 | DENG Jonathan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
57 | SUN Andrew | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | RAJAT Rivaan | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
59 | MANCHALA Vedanth | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
60 | WANG Joshua | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
61 | KEEN Trace | < 1% | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
62 | NICHOLAIDES LUKE | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
62 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.