Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 2 | CANDESCU Diana | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 3 | LI Grace Q. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 5 | FERRARI Christina M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 6 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 7 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
| 8 | ZHENG Vivian | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 10 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 11 | KIM Rachael | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 12 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHENG Ivy | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | KOO Haley B. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
| 17 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 19 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 20 | LAM Justina | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 21 | YE Eileen | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | REN Olivia Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | MAROTTA Veronica L. | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | HE Fenghuan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 26 | ABAYEVA Sasha | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | XU Madison | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | BREKER Anika | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | |
| 31 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 1% | 8% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | AHN Isabella | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | YU Jaime L. | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | LI Meilin | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SHAW Kayla M. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | VEERKAMP Molly | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | NICOU Melina | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | MOLHO Sofia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | WU Irene M. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 46 | DU Hannah | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 48 | BECKER Elena | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 50 | SILVER Anna | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 3% | 59% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 54% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SU Michelle | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | HUANG NATALIE | 26% | 44% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | YEUNG Cherry | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.