Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 2 | CANDESCU Diana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
| 3 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 5 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 6 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 7 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 8 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 10 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 11 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 12 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 14 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 16 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
| 17 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 19 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 20 | LAM Justina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 21 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | REN Olivia Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 23 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 24 | MAROTTA Veronica L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | ABAYEVA Sasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | XU Madison | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% | |
| 31 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 32 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | AHN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | LI Meilin | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 38 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 45 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 46 | DU Hannah | 100% | 82% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 48 | BECKER Elena | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 50 | SILVER Anna | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 100% | 97% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SU Michelle | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | YEUNG Cherry | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.