LeRoy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex, NC Central University - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YE Ivan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 2 | WANG Justin | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 3 | GONG Gavin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | BALU Aedan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 5 | HALL Noah | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% | ||
| 6 | LIU Aaron | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 7 | HUCHWAJDA Alex | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 8 | HENRY Cadel | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% | ||
| 9 | XU Ivan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 10 | GUREVICH Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 11 | SLAVNOV Anton | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 12 | VALENCIA Jose | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
| 13 | KURILO Michael | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
| 14 | HU Harry | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 15 | BREUER Daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | BENE Andrew | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | KIM Samuel | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 1% |
| 18 | MEHTA Yash | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 19 | BADMUS Joshua | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 20 | LIU Jayden | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 21 | FENG Brendan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 22 | LIU Ethan | 15% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 23 | PAUL James | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | GUAN Adam | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 25 | KANE Kiran | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 26 | YAO Zachary | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | CHAWLA Abhishek | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HUANG Ziyi | 13% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 29 | HOWERTON Beckett | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | ||
| 30 | WANG Tim | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | BARRY Dave | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | BENE Paul | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | XU Princeton | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | THEUNISSE Oliver | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | WELLMAN Jack | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | YANG Justin | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | LIAO Sirui | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 37 | OTT William | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | BRAMLETT Myer | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | QIN toby | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LEMERY Marc | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 42 | LEE Ezra | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | JAVIER Xavier | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.