Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHRETIEN PAULINE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 2 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | ZHANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 3 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 6 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 7 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 9 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 10 | KULKARNI Diya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 11 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 13 | CHOI Lyla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 14 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | YOON Julia J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 16 | HUH Anna | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 18 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 19 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 21 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 22 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 23 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 24 | NI Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 25 | LEE Olive | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 27 | GU Sarah | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 28 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 1% |
| 30 | PARTE Isabella B. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | HILL Phoebe | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | HENRY Asha S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | - |
| 33 | APONTE Monica I. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | LANZMAN Anna B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 35 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 38 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 39 | SAFKO Liubov V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 2% |
| 39 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | WICKEN Baylee S. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | NICOU Nicole | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 44 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | CANNEY Lauren | 100% | 71% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | JOHNSON Ryleigh E. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | MOK Chloe R. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | BRADLEY Katherine | 100% | 63% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | CORDERO Allison | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ZISCHKE Alexandra A. | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.