Hendrix Student Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FAN Yuchen | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 3% | |
2 | BIRT David (Dave) L. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
3 | SINGH Arnav | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
3 | RAVI Arjun | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 55% | |
5 | LIU dylan Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
6 | MARSHALL Wesley | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
7 | MALONE Jacob | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
8 | KRIEGER Jack | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
9 | LE Kevin | - | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% | |
10 | LEE Aaron | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
11 | CHUNG Joseph | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
12 | COLLINS Andrew M. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
13 | ILENRE Roni | - | - | 5% | 29% | 45% | 20% | |
14 | HE Lingyun Matthew | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 5% | |
15 | ARZT Nicholas | - | - | 8% | 40% | 41% | 11% | |
16 | GREEN Marvin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
17 | CHRISTMAN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
18 | TATSAPAUGH Jonah | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 32% | |
19 | SANDERS Charlotte | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
20 | NORWOOD Malik | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
21 | ASBY Will | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
22 | PELLI Madeleine | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
23 | MILLER Jonathan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
23 | CHA Patrick | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
25 | HAWKINS Sophia | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
26 | COLLIER Baiden C. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
27 | HUA daniel | 1% | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
28 | BELL Michael S. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
29 | CARCATERRA Theodore | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | FERRARO Nicholas | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
31 | MCGINNISS Andrew | 4% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - | |
32 | CHUNG Jesse | 2% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
33 | WATKINS james | 1% | 11% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
34 | LANDERS Sarah | 2% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | MEIER Nicholas M. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | YI Jonathan | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
37 | ARMES Maggie | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
38 | HERRICK Kerry K. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 6% | - | |
39 | GEISSLER Maximilian | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
40 | HUDSON Tyler | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
41 | DOTY Matthew | 7% | 33% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
42 | HAMBRICK Addison | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
43 | MCGUIRE Meghan | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
44 | SONG Vivian | 10% | 54% | 32% | 4% | - | - | |
45 | BERNSTEIN Leo | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
46 | BAIK Sean | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
47 | REID Simon | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
48 | HOLT Tayla | 50% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
49 | HOLMES Sullivan | 39% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
50 | LEVERETT Corrina | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
51 | MOY Eva | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
52 | FALL Isatou | 2% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | HAZEL Susan L. | 7% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | |
54 | KINSELLA John | 9% | 54% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
55 | HICKS Matthew | 30% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | VAZQUEZ Marco | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
57 | LEE janice | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.