Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GANTA Vijay | 1% | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 2 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 36% | 18% |
| 3 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 3 | LEE Jude H. | 4% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 5 | GINIS Nathan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 6 | GILLIGAN Wolff | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 7 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 9 | GHOSH Tuhin | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 10 | YEN Preston | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 11 | CHAN Daniel | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 13 | DEWEY Charles J. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 14 | GEORGE Daniel | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | NOBLE Colin | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | HUANG Tyler T. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | TANG Brendan J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 18 | CHO Brandon | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 19 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | WILSON Jude | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 21 | TANG Albert | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 22 | HONG Vincent Q. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 23 | DIPIETRO Christopher J. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | WU MENGKE | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | JUN Ryan | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | HUANG Ethan F. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 28 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | FISK Ethan | 4% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | REN Richard | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | PATTON Colin T. | < 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 33 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 34 | NEVILLE James | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | PANDEY Neil | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | 31% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | ELIN Adam E. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KREGER Evan | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | MASSO Anthony | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.