Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GANTA Vijay | V V D V D | V V V V V | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 2 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 3 | LEVIN Mark A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 3 | LEE Jude H. | D V D V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 5 | GINIS Nathan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | GILLIGAN Wolff | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | D V V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | GHOSH Tuhin | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | YEN Preston | V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 11 | CHAN Daniel | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | DEWEY Charles J. | V D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 14 | GEORGE Daniel | D D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 15 | NOBLE Colin | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 16 | HUANG Tyler T. | D D D D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 17 | TANG Brendan J. | V V V V V V | D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 18 | CHO Brandon | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 19 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | V D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 20 | WILSON Jude | V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | TANG Albert | V V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 22 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | DIPIETRO Christopher J. | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | WU MENGKE | D V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 25 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | JUN Ryan | V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | HUANG Ethan F. | V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | TIERNO Thomas J. | D D V V D | V D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 29 | FISK Ethan | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | REN Richard | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 31 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 32 | PATTON Colin T. | D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 33 | BOURGHOL Matthew | D V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 34 | NEVILLE James | V D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | PANDEY Neil | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 36 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | ELIN Adam E. | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 38 | KREGER Evan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | MASSO Anthony | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.