Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TIEMANN Landen | V V V V V | V V V V V | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 2 | MCMAHAN Christopher D. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 1.1 | 5 | +3.9 |
| 3 | HESS Marc F. | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | V V D D V | V V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 5 | RAY William | V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 6 | HERNDON Liam | V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | O'CONNOR Ryan (Ryan O'Connor) D. | V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 8 | POOLE James M. | D D D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | EMMERT JP | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 10 | PARISI Nolan W. | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 11 | LAING Flynt | V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 12 | MAI Ryan | D D V V V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 13 | ALLEY Everett T | D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 14 | KASKAN Peter E. | D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 15 | DERHAM Drew | V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 16 | VILLAREAL Quentin | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 17 | GEIGER Devin T. | V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 18 | BLOM Mark D. | D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 19 | SCHWARY Irv | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | POHL Philip | V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 21 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | MAI Jonathan | V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | GASTON Ryan | V D D D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 24 | YAWN Joshua | D V D D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 25 | SOTTILE Cole | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | WAID Ian | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 27 | SMALL slater | D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | CHEN Leetyan | D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 29 | HAWLEY Justin | D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 30 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | D V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 31 | MCINTURFF Walker | V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | DAVIS Richard M. | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | MAI Hung | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 34 | GUIDRY Rod | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 35 | STARR Michael | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.