Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 2 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 3 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% |
| 3 | YOU Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
| 5 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 6 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 21% |
| 7 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 8 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 9 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 10 | QU Zhida (Richard) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 11 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% |
| 12 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 13 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 14 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 14 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 16 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 17 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 18 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 19 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | GUO Joey | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 9% |
| 23 | YU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 9% |
| 24 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 25 | WEI Winston | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
| 28 | JACOB Ezra | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 30 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 31 | YANG Tate | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | PARK Avan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 33 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 35 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 37 | WU Thomas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 38 | LEUNG Tsun Yin (TY) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 39 | YANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 40 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | PESKIN Kepler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | YANG Steve | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHEN Avery | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | CHIANG Aiden | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | VALENCIA Anthony N. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 49 | VALENCIA Beryn L. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WARD Spencer | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MINN Nathan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 54 | SHENOY sean | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | WU Silin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | ROTHSCHILD Jonah | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | RIGGS Jude | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | WU Vincent Moxiao | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | XU Ethan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 63 | ALVAREZ Sebastian | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | TEOH Liam | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | SHENOY Neil | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | TALBOT Jett | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 68 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | LE Oliver | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.