Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
2 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
3 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
3 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
5 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
6 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
7 | JOHNSON Honor | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
8 | KONG Vera | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
9 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
9 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
11 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 27% | 3% |
12 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
13 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
14 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 34% | 63% |
15 | KER Grace | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
16 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
17 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 44% | 12% |
18 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 38% | |
19 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
20 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 13% |
20 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
22 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
23 | MILLER Sky | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 60% | 24% |
24 | TONG Kunling | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
25 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 46% | 11% | |
26 | LIU Sophie | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
27 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 1% | 11% | 38% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
29 | JUNG Irene | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 18% | 1% |
29 | PERRIER Eleonore | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
31 | WOZNIAK Dagmara I. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% |
32 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 28% | |
33 | XIAO julie | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
34 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
35 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
36 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 51% | 15% |
37 | LAURI Keira | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - |
38 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
39 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% |
40 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% |
41 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 30% | 3% |
42 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
44 | KIM Marley I. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
45 | ANDREYEVA Darya | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
46 | JOHNSON Lydia | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
47 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
47 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% |
49 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
49 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
51 | MIKA Veronica | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 11% | |
52 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
53 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 35% | 7% |
54 | LU Elaine | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
55 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
56 | FEIG Sela | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
57 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - | - |
58 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
59 | HUAI Delilah | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
60 | FESTA Carina | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - | |
61 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
62 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
63 | HE Charlotte | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
64 | YAO Rainie | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | SHI Cathleen | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
66 | CHEN Ashley | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
67 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
68 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
69 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
70 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
71 | LIU Zhi Jun | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
72 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
73 | MARYASH Samantha | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
74 | CHUNG Hailey | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
75 | SAYLES Nina R. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
75 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
77 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
78 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
78 | PAUL Lila | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 2% |
80 | GRULICH Rayaana | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
81 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
82 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 5% | - |
83 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 1% |
83 | LU Amy | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
85 | LIGH Erenei J. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
85 | SENOGLU Irmak | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
87 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
87 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 24% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
89 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
90 | WEI Vivian W. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
91 | LIN Nicole | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
92 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
93 | YANG Lea | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
94 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
95 | ZHANG XUANYI | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - | |
96 | DUCKETT Madison | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
96 | TSUI Natalie | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
98 | LIU Yifei | 14% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
99 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
100 | JEONG Katie | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
101 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - | - |
101 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
101 | MELNYCHUK Yelyzaveta | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
104 | TSE Angelina | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
105 | KHAN Alissa | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
106 | GUVEN Coco | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
106 | WU Helen | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
108 | LEE Hannah | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
108 | NATH Trisha | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
108 | SHI Julia | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
111 | DHAR Layla | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
112 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
113 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
113 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
115 | LIM Jaslene | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
116 | XU Emily T. | 22% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
117 | CHIANG Melissa | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
118 | MUND Ruth | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
119 | HU Michelle | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
120 | LACSON Sarah | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
120 | BLUM Leah I. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
122 | HUANG Rachael | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
123 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | < 1% | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
124 | DAI Olivia | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
125 | DONG Angel | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
125 | PABIAN Emilia | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
127 | NGUYEN Siena | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
127 | SCOTT Eve | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
129 | HUANG MADELINE | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
130 | WANG Elysia | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
131 | FAVO Isabella | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
132 | ZHANG Chenfei | 11% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
133 | WEI JoyAnn | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
134 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 1% |
135 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
136 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
137 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
138 | DANTULURI Shalini | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
139 | MANN Sophia J. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
140 | SO Catelyn | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
140 | MAKLIN Sofia | 26% | 50% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
142 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
143 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
143 | ATTIA Jasmine | 21% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
145 | GLUCK Myriam | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
145 | COLTER Aurora | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
147 | BAKER Audrey C. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
147 | YU Zhiang | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
149 | ZHANG Sophie | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.