The Fencing Center of San Jose - san jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG James | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | < 1% |
2 | DUFF Michael | - | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
3 | TAN Daniel | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
3 | HAGENBUCH Isabella | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
5 | TANG Athena | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | < 1% | - |
6 | HA Emmalene | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
7 | LI Sky | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
8 | CHEN Chelsea | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
9 | LEE Caleb | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
10 | VOORHIES Maximilian | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
11 | KIM Connor | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
12 | SHKALIKOVA Anastasiia | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
13 | MENDOZA YSABELLA LOUISE | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
14 | SETH Suraj | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.