Student Recreation Center @ Texas State University - San Marcos, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KRAMER Jack P. | V V V D | V V V V V | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 2 | POPOVICI Andrew | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LUEBBE Jost | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | MCALISTER Ian | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | V V V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 6 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 7 | WOODALL Ian L. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | OBREBSKI Kevin | D D D D V | V V V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 9 | SALEH Omar | V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 10 | SCEROLER Anslee | V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 11 | EMMERT Jp | V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 12 | GOODMAN Benjamin | V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 13 | SAIKOLAPPAN Narensankar | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | KASKAN Peter E. | D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 15 | RAO Neil | V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 16 | TAYLOR Liam F. | D V V D D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | NGUYEN Bao | V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 18 | MANGAN Hunter | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | SMITH Samuel J. | V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 20 | PATEL Avi | V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 21 | BIGGS Jacob | V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 22 | BARTON Christian | V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | FRANZESE Nicholas P. | D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 24 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 25 | HAWLEY Justin | D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | COLARES BADKE TOCCHETTO Lucca | D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | WILLIAMS Nasir | V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | NG Dylan | D D V V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 30 | VAN VACTER Thomas | D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 31 | GRIMSHAW Tim | V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 33 | REHUREK Luke | D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 34 | HURT Stone | D V D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 35 | LE Nathan | D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 36 | JAMAIL Luke | D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 37 | THOMA Jackson | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | HWANG Joseph | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 39 | NEWSOM Finn | D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 40 | TIEMANN Aidan | D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 41 | TULLY Gage | D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 42 | JAMES thomas | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 43 | TAPSCOTT Nicolas | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.