Bobcat Open

Men's Épée

Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Student Recreation Center @ Texas State University - San Marcos, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 KRAMER Jack P. - - - 3% 97%
2 POPOVICI Andrew - 1% 7% 35% 57%
3 LUEBBE Jost - - - - 7% 93%
3 MCALISTER Ian - - - 4% 26% 70%
5 SANCHEZ Emanuel 3% 28% 48% 21%
6 ABBONDANZIO David R. - 3% 16% 36% 35% 11%
7 WOODALL Ian L. - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8%
8 OBREBSKI Kevin 7% 28% 38% 22% 5% -
9 SALEH Omar - 2% 17% 44% 36%
10 SCEROLER Anslee 5% 23% 38% 27% 7% -
11 EMMERT Jp - 3% 22% 54% 20%
12 GOODMAN Benjamin 5% 25% 39% 25% 6% -
13 SAIKOLAPPAN Narensankar 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 5%
14 KASKAN Peter E. 2% 13% 37% 39% 9%
15 RAO Neil 12% 37% 37% 13% 1%
16 TAYLOR Liam F. 5% 23% 38% 27% 7% -
17 NGUYEN Bao - 4% 31% 64% 2%
18 MANGAN Hunter 2% 18% 43% 30% 7% -
19 SMITH Samuel J. 4% 26% 46% 22% 3%
20 PATEL Avi 4% 25% 43% 25% 3%
21 BIGGS Jacob 9% 46% 39% 6%
22 BARTON Christian 1% 10% 30% 39% 18% 2%
23 FRANZESE Nicholas P. 1% 11% 46% 43%
24 KOSTUSIAK Evan 7% 31% 41% 19% 2%
25 HAWLEY Justin 20% 48% 29% 3% -
26 COLARES BADKE TOCCHETTO Lucca 8% 31% 39% 19% 2%
27 WILLIAMS Nasir - 4% 20% 41% 30% 3%
28 NG Dylan 33% 42% 20% 4% - -
30 VAN VACTER Thomas 17% 42% 32% 8% -
31 GRIMSHAW Tim 21% 43% 29% 7% -
33 REHUREK Luke 45% 41% 13% 2% -
34 HURT Stone 25% 44% 26% 5% -
35 LE Nathan 13% 41% 37% 8% -
36 JAMAIL Luke 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5%
37 THOMA Jackson 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% -
38 HWANG Joseph 37% 43% 17% 3% - -
39 NEWSOM Finn 34% 48% 17% - -
40 TIEMANN Aidan 1% 13% 38% 36% 11%
41 TULLY Gage 65% 30% 4% -
42 JAMES thomas 2% 12% 32% 38% 17% 1%
43 TAPSCOTT Nicolas 13% 39% 34% 12% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.