Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
2 | FISHMAN Rahm | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
3 | TIKHONOV Daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
3 | HULL Liam | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
5 | RIGGINS Joshua | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
6 | WANG Evan Haoxuan | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 41% | |
7 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
8 | MODULLA Yathin R. | - | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 18% | |
9 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
10 | HAN Sam | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
11 | TREBON Hayden | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
12 | HE Kaixuan | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
13 | CORBIN Bennett | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
14 | LAM Alan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
15 | CLICK Tristan | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
16 | LIN Kason | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
17 | YU Samuel | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
18 | RUIZ Jayden | 28% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
19 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 28% | 47% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
20 | DAN Rex | - | 6% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
21 | PETROW Zoryan | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
22 | SINGH Ravin | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
23 | YI Nathan | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | RAVI Arjun | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
25 | AYOTTE James | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
26 | RUSSELL James | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
27 | JONES Jackson | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
28 | SNYDER Ari | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
29 | XIE Brandon | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
30 | PAL Ian K. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
31 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
32 | CORDOVA Colin | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | LEE Aiden | - | 5% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
34 | WATERS Nathaniel | 16% | 44% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
35 | BETTS Kieran | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
36 | CARO Seph | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | |
37 | CHA Patrick | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
38 | ARZT Nicholas | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
39 | ZHANG Lucas | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
40 | SCHIFFHAUER Bram | 57% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | YANG Gary | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | JEONG Arisu | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
43 | SZIEDE Kieran | 30% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
44 | NAM Nathaniel | 53% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
45 | KHEGAY Martin | 30% | 47% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.