Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARVALHO Daniel S. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 2 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 39% | 13% |
| 3 | SEABURY Maxwell G. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 3 | LESPERANCE Lucas | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | DANZIG Jacob S. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 6 | SILVERS Noah E. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 7 | DAO Matthew M. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 8 | ZHANG William | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | XIAN Riley | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 11 | STEVENS James F. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | YAO Shun | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | LI Brian X | 2% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 14 | KELSEY Ryan | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 11% |
| 16 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | WANG Nathan | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 53% | 23% |
| 18 | ROBINSON Riley | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 42% | 49% |
| 19 | SYED Saif M. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 20 | XIAN Ryan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 20 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 22 | MARAKOV Allen B. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 23 | GREEN Jake L. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 24 | MCDERMOTT Brian | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | FARQUHARSON Cole | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | LEI Jacob | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | KRONROD Tal | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 28 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 29 | DEO Ameya | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | FRY Nicholas (Nico) J. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | BYNAGARI Prateek | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KIM Michael | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MCINTYRE Gregory R. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | MIELE Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 35 | ALAIMO Charles | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
| 37 | FAN Beichen | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 38 | ALTHARDT Michael W. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 39 | PAK Charles | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | GUI Runlin | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | CRASWELL Andrew J. | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 42 | SIDEWATER Matthew | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | MOON Ryan Y. | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 44 | OH Matthew M. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | FRANCO-TENTIOUK Christopher J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | XIANG HONGYI | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | HU Matthew | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
| 49 | NGUYEN Steven | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | REINER Julius J. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 51 | GARCIA Christopher W. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 52 | CHO Tyler H. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | WILLIAMS Derek | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 53 | CONKLIN Jim | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | ALI Adam | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BEACH Nicholas | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 57 | ZUBECK Dominic | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | SPAIN Colin | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 60 | BYNAGARI Niketh | 17% | 47% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | HURST Palmer | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | MCAMIS Eli D. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | DALY Conor | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | ZHANG zhiyin | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | TERRELL Theodore M. | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | KUHN Jeffrey | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 69 | AHN Sung-Ho | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 70 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | RODNEY Maxwell | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 73 | STONE Ken | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | MILLER Lance W. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | TIERNEY Luke | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 76 | JOO Benjamin | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.