Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VITI Mark G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% | |
| 2 | LEE Joshua | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 3 | HUTH Jacob | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 3 | PAULSON Connor M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 5 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | 5% | 26% | 49% | 19% | |
| 6 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 7 | RINEHART Conner M. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 8 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 9 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 10 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | BUERGIN Aidan | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 13 | GU Jeffrey | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 14 | CUI Anthony | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 16 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 17 | MADDUX Lance A. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 3% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | EDWARDS Mark S. | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | YU Jonathan J. | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 22 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 23 | LIU John | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | DRESSEL Jet | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 25 | BUERGIN Lance | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.