Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHAW Ian | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 | |
| 2 | RUTHERFURD John "Trace" | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 | |
| 3 | FORD Tillman | V V V V V V | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 | |
| 4 | WAGNER Lyndsay | V V V V V | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 | |
| 5 | WEBB Jacob | V V V V | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 | |
| 6 | SHAFRITZ Noah | V V V D V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 | |
| 7 | ZHOU Alec | V V D V V | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 | |
| 8 | SINGH Arnav | V V V D V | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 | |
| 9 | NGUYEN Audrey | V V V D V | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 | |
| 10 | KULIKOWSKI Adam | D V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 | |
| 11 | PARCELEWICZ John | V D V V V | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 | |
| 12 | YAWN Joshua | D V V V V | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 | |
| 13 | WANG Maxwell | D V D V V V | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 | |
| 14 | KIM Daniel | V D V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 | |
| 15 | NWOKOLO Lotenne | V V D D V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 | |
| 16 | LEE Daehyeon | D V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 | |
| 17 | CARRIE Konnor | V D V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
| 19 | SOTTILE Cole | V D D V V | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 | |
| 20 | MAI Ryan | D V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 | |
| 21 | ORLANDO Dante | V V D D V | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 | |
| 22 | CANTRELL Jason | D D V V | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 | |
| 23 | CHAMBERS Matthew | D V D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
| 24 | HAWKINS Sophia | V V D D D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 | |
| 25 | TUCKER Evan | D V D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 26 | FRAZIER Wylie | V D D V D V | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 | |
| 27 | PIERCE Chandon | V D D V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
| 29 | MOSS Riley | D V D V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 | |
| 31 | AGUILLON Alexis | D D D V V | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 | |
| 32 | RAVITA Henry | D D V V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 | |
| 33 | WATKINS James | D D V V D D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
| 34 | MACKEVICIUS Nykolas | D D V D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 35 | DOUGLAS John | V D D D D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 | |
| 36 | LY Gabriel | D D V D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
| 37 | AGYEN-FREMPONG Nic | D D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 38 | ELEY Ellis | D V D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
| 40 | SHADOFF Samantha | D V D D D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 41 | STEWART Sarah | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 42 | MCLENDON Matthew | D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 43 | DORAN McKenna | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 44 | RATTEERREE Michelle | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
| 46 | MENDEZ Lucero | D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.