Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PROFIS Liora | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 2 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 3 | SHIV Avni | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 3 | SOBUS Yanka | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 5 | GUO Luxi | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 6 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
| 7 | WALLER DEL VALLE Alanis | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 8 | CAMPBELL Eva | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 9 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 10 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
| 11 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 12 | LEE Claire | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
| 13 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 14 | WANG Zoe | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 15 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 16 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 17 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 18 | LEE Scarlett | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 46% | 39% |
| 19 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 5% | 29% | 49% | 16% | |
| 20 | NIX Reagan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 21 | MARTINEZ Christina | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 54% | |
| 23 | AIRES Julia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 24 | CARRIER Meredith | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 25 | XIAO Nancy | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 26 | NEELAM Navya | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 27 | XU Serena | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 28 | NGUYEN Ella | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | ILYAS Ayah | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
| 31 | LEE Gloria Y. | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | SEREGIN Katya | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | PHUKAN Indra | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 34 | YILMAZ Pinar | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 35 | QI Julieanne | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | GANSER Nicole | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 38 | WANG Ziqiao (Claire) | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 39 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 40 | JIANG Kehui | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 41 | HALE Avery | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | BOROTKO Katerina | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 43 | YOUNG VIVIAN | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 44 | STERR Isabella M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 45 | JIANG Serena | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 46 | KROPP Anne | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 47 | JIN Zhengtian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 48 | LI Alice | 6% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | SCHMITT Harper | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 50 | LEE Camilla | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 51 | WANG Sophie Y. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 53 | WANG Victoria | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 54 | LISCUM Vivian | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 55 | SUN Hanya | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
| 55 | MCQUEEN Morgan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 57 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 58 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 59 | LI Azalea | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 60 | ZHU Riley | 4% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | FLITMAN Gabrielle | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 62 | WU Jessica | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 63 | HOLDEN Helena | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | BI Michelle | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 65 | KAUR Manroop | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | WU Michelle | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 67 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | CHEN Stephanie | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 69 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 70 | GUAN Isabella | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 71 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 72 | MYRAH Vivienne | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% | |
| 73 | LI Olivia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 74 | WONG Caitlin | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 75 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 23% | 3% | |
| 76 | ELTERMAN Kate | 13% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | CHERNIS Liah | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 78 | LIN Ariel | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 79 | FRANGER Macy | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 80 | KALGAONKAR Arohi | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 81 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 82 | HABEK Sophia | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 83 | KANASKAR Ila | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 84 | XU Jessica | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 85 | BEATIE Isabella M. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 86 | STERN Savannah | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 87 | KANE Chloe | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 88 | MCCREIGHT Elena | 11% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 90 | SHIBLEY Micaela | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | XU Chenyu | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 92 | MCCLURE Samar | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 93 | WEI Sherry | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 94 | GAN Shelby | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | WU Madisen | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 96 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 97 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 98 | JEYOON Lauren | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 99 | WANG Emma | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 100 | MEYER Rebecca | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 101 | DESAI Ela | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 102 | WANG Chloe | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 103 | KELLEY Elise | 9% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 104 | RADOV Una | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 105 | ZHANG Helen | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | OLSON Olivia | 25% | 47% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 106 | PETROFF Eva | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 108 | HE Anna | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 109 | MOLLINIER Angel | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 110 | ZHAO Yanning | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 111 | PARK elli | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 112 | BLANCO Ariia | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 113 | YAO Chloe | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 114 | PEI Claire | 10% | 37% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 115 | AWALEGAONKAR Saina | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 116 | LIN Isabel | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 117 | SHELTON Mya | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 118 | WANG Cecilia | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 119 | MADANNAVAR Trisha | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 120 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 121 | WANG Selina | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 122 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 123 | DENEALE Lucia | 29% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 124 | STOY Sophia | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 125 | HUANG Selina | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 126 | LEE Adelynn | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 127 | VIOLETTE Lih-Ann | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 128 | LI Jasmine | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 129 | DESAI Eesha | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 130 | REED Katya | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 131 | UEMURA Lyllia | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 132 | HALE Reagan | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 133 | RAPTIS Layla | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.