November NAC

Y-14 Women's Épée

Friday, November 10, 2023 at 12:00 PM

Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 PROFIS Liora 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 27%
2 RICHARDSON Meredith 100% 99% 92% 65% 25% 4%
3 SHIV Avni 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
3 SOBUS Yanka 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 18%
5 GUO Luxi 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 31%
6 FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 17%
7 WALLER DEL VALLE Alanis 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9%
8 CAMPBELL Eva 100% 100% 96% 74% 34% 6%
9 WATTANAKIT Anda 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 47%
10 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 11%
11 WANG Ziqi (yoyo) 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 48%
12 LEE Claire 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 28%
13 PRESMAN Aerin 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 14%
14 WANG Zoe 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 18%
15 DEPOMMIER Isabelle 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
16 SU Evelyn 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 22%
17 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 62%
18 LEE Scarlett 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 39%
19 WANG Jessie 100% 100% 100% 94% 65% 16%
20 NIX Reagan 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 15%
21 MARTINEZ Christina 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 18% 2%
22 SMUK Alexandra S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 54%
23 AIRES Julia 100% 99% 93% 68% 30% 5%
24 CARRIER Meredith 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
25 XIAO Nancy 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 17%
26 NEELAM Navya 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 30% 6%
27 XU Serena 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 32% 4%
28 NGUYEN Ella 100% 100% 91% 62% 24% 4% -
29 ILYAS Ayah 100% 95% 71% 34% 8% 1%
30 BEAVER Ava 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39%
31 LEE Gloria Y. 100% 97% 79% 41% 10% 1%
32 SEREGIN Katya 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 2%
33 PHUKAN Indra 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
34 YILMAZ Pinar 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 44% 11%
35 QI Julieanne 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4%
36 GANSER Nicole 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 12% 1%
37 NOVOJILOV Anastasia 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
38 WANG Ziqiao (Claire) 100% 100% 94% 71% 34% 8% -
39 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 37%
40 JIANG Kehui 100% 99% 87% 53% 18% 2%
41 HALE Avery 100% 96% 76% 40% 11% 1%
42 BOROTKO Katerina 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
43 YOUNG VIVIAN 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 26%
44 STERR Isabella M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 10%
45 JIANG Serena 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
46 KROPP Anne 100% 100% 94% 68% 29% 6% -
47 JIN Zhengtian 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
48 LI Alice 100% 94% 64% 26% 5% -
49 SCHMITT Harper 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 6%
50 LEE Camilla 100% 100% 96% 75% 34% 6%
51 WANG Sophie Y. 100% 98% 83% 48% 15% 2% -
51 KUMAR Eva 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
53 WANG Victoria 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 38% 8%
54 LISCUM Vivian 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 35% 7%
55 SUN Hanya 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 9%
55 MCQUEEN Morgan 100% 99% 90% 60% 24% 4% -
57 MONOVA Lilyana 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 17% 2%
58 CAMAMA Tessa 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 27% 4%
59 LI Azalea 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 21% 3%
60 ZHU Riley 100% 96% 61% 21% 4% -
61 FLITMAN Gabrielle 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 2% -
62 WU Jessica 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
63 HOLDEN Helena 100% 82% 44% 13% 2% -
64 BI Michelle 100% 96% 76% 41% 12% 2% -
65 KAUR Manroop 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 6% 1%
66 WU Michelle 100% 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1%
67 SHEFFIELD Skye 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 11% 1%
68 CHEN Stephanie 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 17% 2%
69 SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 2%
70 GUAN Isabella 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 32% 6%
71 HAUSHEER Kuncen 100% 99% 87% 57% 23% 5% -
72 MYRAH Vivienne 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 11%
73 LI Olivia 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 8%
74 WONG Caitlin 100% 100% 94% 69% 30% 5%
75 MISHIMA Audrey 100% 100% 95% 71% 25% 3%
76 ELTERMAN Kate 100% 87% 47% 13% 2% -
77 CHERNIS Liah 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% -
78 LIN Ariel 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
79 FRANGER Macy 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19% 2%
80 KALGAONKAR Arohi 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 4% -
81 ABUELFUTUH Sama 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 11%
82 HABEK Sophia 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 9%
83 KANASKAR Ila 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 7% 1%
84 XU Jessica 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3% -
85 BEATIE Isabella M. 100% 100% 93% 67% 29% 6% -
86 STERN Savannah 100% 97% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
87 KANE Chloe 100% 99% 89% 59% 24% 5% -
88 MCCREIGHT Elena 100% 89% 55% 20% 4% - -
89 DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
90 SHIBLEY Micaela 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
91 XU Chenyu 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1%
92 MCCLURE Samar 100% 100% 94% 70% 33% 7% -
93 WEI Sherry 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 12% 1%
94 GAN Shelby 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
95 WU Madisen 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
96 SCHOR Elisabeth 100% 99% 88% 57% 20% 4% -
97 FISCHBEIN Quinley 100% 98% 81% 45% 14% 2% -
98 JEYOON Lauren 100% 94% 68% 31% 8% 1% -
99 WANG Emma 100% 94% 68% 32% 8% 1% -
100 MEYER Rebecca 100% 97% 80% 44% 13% 2% -
101 DESAI Ela 100% 89% 52% 16% 3% - -
102 WANG Chloe 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
103 KELLEY Elise 100% 91% 50% 15% 2% - -
104 RADOV Una 100% 85% 47% 14% 2% - -
105 ZHANG Helen 100% 90% 59% 23% 5% - -
106 OLSON Olivia 100% 75% 28% 5% - - -
106 PETROFF Eva 100% 94% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
108 HE Anna 100% 91% 51% 14% 2% -
109 MOLLINIER Angel 100% 98% 82% 46% 14% 2%
110 ZHAO Yanning 100% 79% 35% 6% - -
111 PARK elli 100% 80% 41% 12% 2% -
112 BLANCO Ariia 100% 96% 77% 41% 12% 1%
113 YAO Chloe 100% 74% 28% 4% - -
114 PEI Claire 100% 90% 53% 14% 1% -
115 AWALEGAONKAR Saina 100% 96% 70% 31% 7% 1% -
116 LIN Isabel 100% 99% 89% 58% 22% 4% -
117 SHELTON Mya 100% 40% 8% 1% - - -
118 WANG Cecilia 100% 93% 62% 24% 5% - -
119 MADANNAVAR Trisha 100% 80% 40% 11% 2% - -
120 TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria 100% 69% 26% 5% - - -
121 WANG Selina 100% 96% 72% 33% 8% 1% -
122 YOUSSEF Caroline 100% 61% 18% 3% - -
123 DENEALE Lucia 100% 71% 27% 5% - - -
124 STOY Sophia 100% 74% 33% 8% 1% - -
125 HUANG Selina 100% 48% 11% 1% - -
126 LEE Adelynn 100% 75% 34% 8% 1% - -
127 VIOLETTE Lih-Ann 100% 57% 15% 2% - - -
128 LI Jasmine 100% 19% 1% - - -
129 DESAI Eesha 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
130 REED Katya 100% 62% 17% 2% - - -
131 UEMURA Lyllia 100% 35% 5% - - - -
132 HALE Reagan 100% 41% 7% - - -
133 RAPTIS Layla 100% 27% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.