Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | |
2 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
3 | LEE Aidan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 4% | 28% | 57% | 11% | |
5 | FOTENOS Noah T. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
6 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
7 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
8 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | - | - | 7% | 33% | 49% | 11% | |
9 | MADDUX Lance A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 41% | 6% |
10 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 1% | 11% | 46% | 34% | 7% | - | |
11 | LIU Eric Y. | - | 8% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
12 | GISLER Benjamin B. | - | 6% | 37% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | YU Jonathan J. | - | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
14 | GAO William | 1% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
15 | LONG Connor M. | - | 6% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
16 | DRESSEL Jet | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
17 | ALONSOZANA Andrew G. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
18 | LI Lianhao | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | SOLDATOV Faddey | 1% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
20 | BUERGIN Lance | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
21 | CLICK Aiden | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
22 | KOKE Matthew C. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
23 | SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
23 | SHIPMAN Andrew | 43% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | |
25 | KAN Edward | 11% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.