Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | |
| 2 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 3 | LEE Aidan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 4% | 28% | 57% | 11% | |
| 5 | FOTENOS Noah T. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 6 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 7 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
| 8 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | - | - | 7% | 33% | 49% | 11% | |
| 9 | MADDUX Lance A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 41% | 6% |
| 10 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 1% | 11% | 46% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 11 | LIU Eric Y. | - | 8% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
| 12 | GISLER Benjamin B. | - | 6% | 37% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | YU Jonathan J. | - | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | GAO William | 1% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 15 | LONG Connor M. | - | 6% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | DRESSEL Jet | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | ALONSOZANA Andrew G. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LI Lianhao | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SOLDATOV Faddey | 1% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | BUERGIN Lance | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | CLICK Aiden | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | KOKE Matthew C. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | SHIPMAN Andrew | 43% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | KAN Edward | 11% | 67% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.