University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WANG Maxwell L. | V V V V | V V V V V | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
2 | SARIKONDA Akhil | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
3 | WEBB Jacob T. | D V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
3 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | D V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
5 | ZHOU Alec Q. | V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
6 | WALLACE James | V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
7 | NGUYEN Audrey | V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
8 | WILLIAMS Eli | V V D D | V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
9 | PAYNE John T. | V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
9 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | V V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
9 | SOPER Adam | V V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
12 | POBIS Chandler R. | V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
13 | REYNOLDS Jay | V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
14 | KONG Chuizheng | V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
15 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
16 | STUESSY Nolan | D D V V | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
17 | HE Lingyun Matthew | D V V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
18 | CALINSKY Edward | V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
19 | FORD Tillman | D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
20 | LEVEQUE David G. | V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
21 | SEATON Jake | D V V V | V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
22 | HAWKINS Sophia | D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
23 | PARISH Levi | V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
24 | CAMPBELL Joseph L. | V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
24 | DEEL Hayes | V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
24 | STEWART Brian | D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
27 | HAYES Zackery | D D V V | V D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
28 | KINDEL Amara | V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
29 | SCHUYLER Benjamin | V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
30 | DERRINGER Derrick | D V D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
31 | HAUSER Samuel | D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
32 | BEDWORTH Paige | D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
34 | BULLER Chloe | V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
35 | BLAIR Hailey | D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
36 | BARBER Christopher | V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
36 | RHOTON Christian | D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
38 | NIST Carter | V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
39 | WAHL Nathan | D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
39 | HALE Eli | V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
41 | BRANHAM Willow | D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
42 | SPAULDING Maleah | V D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
43 | WASH James | D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
44 | CROSS Phoenix | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
45 | ORDONEZ Drew | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
46 | OVERSTREET William | D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
47 | BASSO Matthew | D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
48 | BACARISSE Nicholas | D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
49 | VALENZUELA Elijah | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
50 | BARRETT John | D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.