University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | 5% | 50% | 38% | 7% |
| 2 | SARIKONDA Akhil | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 3 | WEBB Jacob T. | 5% | 28% | 45% | 22% | |
| 3 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | - | 3% | 25% | 49% | 23% |
| 5 | ZHOU Alec Q. | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 38% |
| 6 | WALLACE James | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 13% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Audrey | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 8 | WILLIAMS Eli | 1% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 11% |
| 9 | PAYNE John T. | - | - | 3% | 29% | 67% |
| 9 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% |
| 9 | SOPER Adam | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | POBIS Chandler R. | - | - | 6% | 43% | 51% |
| 13 | REYNOLDS Jay | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% |
| 14 | KONG Chuizheng | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 15 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | |
| 16 | STUESSY Nolan | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 17 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 1% | 36% | 46% | 16% | 1% |
| 18 | CALINSKY Edward | - | 4% | 36% | 51% | 9% |
| 19 | FORD Tillman | 2% | 15% | 42% | 38% | 3% |
| 20 | LEVEQUE David G. | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 21 | SEATON Jake | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | HAWKINS Sophia | 6% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% |
| 23 | PARISH Levi | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CAMPBELL Joseph L. | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 24 | DEEL Hayes | 4% | 41% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | STEWART Brian | 1% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 27 | HAYES Zackery | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | KINDEL Amara | 2% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 6% |
| 29 | SCHUYLER Benjamin | 5% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% |
| 30 | DERRINGER Derrick | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | HAUSER Samuel | 16% | 50% | 30% | 5% | |
| 32 | BEDWORTH Paige | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | BULLER Chloe | 31% | 52% | 17% | - | - |
| 35 | BLAIR Hailey | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 36 | BARBER Christopher | 8% | 40% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | RHOTON Christian | 15% | 42% | 35% | 8% | |
| 38 | NIST Carter | 1% | 14% | 41% | 36% | 7% |
| 39 | WAHL Nathan | 7% | 53% | 35% | 6% | - |
| 39 | HALE Eli | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 41 | BRANHAM Willow | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% |
| 42 | SPAULDING Maleah | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WASH James | 2% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
| 44 | CROSS Phoenix | 25% | 48% | 25% | 2% | - |
| 45 | ORDONEZ Drew | 21% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 46 | OVERSTREET William | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 47 | BASSO Matthew | 4% | 22% | 42% | 29% | 4% |
| 48 | BACARISSE Nicholas | 1% | 14% | 44% | 36% | 5% |
| 49 | VALENZUELA Elijah | 8% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 50 | BARRETT John | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.