Fencing Academy of Denver - Littleton, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | PETERSON Matthew | V V D D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 3 | MCCOWN Ronan | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ZHOU Austin | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | DANIS Blake | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | NOFZIGER Bennett | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | KENT Elizabeth | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | CHOI Kaiden | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | LEE Jayden | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | ANDERSON Claire | V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 13 | ALTMAN Jeff | V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | MUENKE Magnus | V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 15 | LEEDER Elizabeth | D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | EYMAN Hans | D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 17 | LUTTON Thomas | V V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 18 | AGGELER Donovan | D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 19 | MARENCIK Miles | V D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 20 | LIU Josh | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | BROOKS Justin | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | WHEELER Luke | D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 23 | ANDERSON Jennifer | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | ZHU Riley | V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | HANEY Kimberly | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | SCHWITZER Eliot | D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 27 | THOMSON Sarah | D D D V V | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 | |
| 28 | FRENCH Phaelen | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 29 | SUN Neo | D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 30 | EMERSON Zachary | D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | MILLER Mason | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | WILSON Trevor | D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | ANDERSON Donald | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 34 | LIM Marcus | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 35 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 36 | TIEKING Noah | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.