Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANAUGH Guy | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
| 2 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 3 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | - | 1% | 18% | 48% | 27% | 5% | < 1% |
| 3 | REDEMANN Shawn | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 5 | TURNER Joshua | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 6 | EDWARDS Tim | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 7 | FULLER II Thomas | 2% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 8 | MCNARY Sean | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 9 | THARP Jayden | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 10 | CRAFT David M. | 1% | 20% | 45% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | TRAN John | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 12 | HABEGGER Alexander | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 13 | NEIDLINGER Robert H. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 14 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | OAKES Scarlett | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | PACK Josh | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 18 | WARD Andrew | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | 1% | |
| 19 | GILL Anhad | 1% | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | DURR Anna | 66% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.