Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | FARIDI Imran | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% |
| 2 | BOYLAN John R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 46% |
| 3 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | PASZEK Elijah | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 5 | DOLOJAN Jesse | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 6 | JOHNSON Eli | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 7 | DUNN Linda J. J. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | MBERIA Alexander | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | BELLMAN William | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 35% | 6% |
| 10 | MEFFORD Mitchell | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 11 | JOHNSON Pamela | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | KILGORE Robert | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 13 | WHAPHAM Mark | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 14 | WINTERGERST Maxwell | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 4% |
| 15 | FULLER II Thomas | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 16 | GUTHRIE Andrew | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | BRAGG EAB Emily A. | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 18 | KEATING Richard | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | HARRIS-BROOKS Deon | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 20 | ADAMS Crawford | 3% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 20 | SHASA Angela | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | ZOERNIG Emily | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WOODRUFF Audrey | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 24 | MATHEIS Grace | 18% | 48% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.