Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | FARIDI Imran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 10% |
2 | BOYLAN John R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
3 | WILSON Dawn J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
3 | PASZEK Elijah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
5 | DOLOJAN Jesse | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
6 | JOHNSON Eli | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
7 | DUNN Linda J. J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
8 | MBERIA Alexander | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
9 | BELLMAN William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 6% |
10 | MEFFORD Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
11 | JOHNSON Pamela | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
12 | KILGORE Robert | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
13 | WHAPHAM Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
14 | WINTERGERST Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 4% |
15 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
16 | GUTHRIE Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
17 | BRAGG EAB Emily A. | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | KEATING Richard | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
19 | HARRIS-BROOKS Deon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
20 | ADAMS Crawford | 100% | 97% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
20 | SHASA Angela | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
22 | ZOERNIG Emily | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | WOODRUFF Audrey | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
24 | MATHEIS Grace | 100% | 82% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.