Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Youlong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 2 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
| 3 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 3 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 5 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 6 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 9% |
| 7 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 8 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
| 9 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 10 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 11 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 12 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 13 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 14 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 27% |
| 15 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
| 16 | LIN Xilong | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 18 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 21% | |
| 19 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 5% |
| 22 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
| 24 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | DUNLAP Ezra | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | DENG David | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | DAYAL Vedant | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YORK Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 37 | BAKER Ethan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 38 | SMITH Jeremiah | 100% | 91% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 40 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | PE Noah | 100% | 97% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | TSAO Holden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 43 | ZHOU Aiden | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | ALBERS Asher | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | HE Bourne | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | FOY Grant | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | SIDDIQI Amman | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | KEITH HUDSON | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | BANUELOS Dario | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.