Richmond Fencing Club, Richmond VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | SHOWALTER Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% | |
| 2 | MILLSON Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 3 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 3 | WALLACE George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 5 | ANDERSON Dean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 6 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% |
| 7 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | ZIMSKY James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | HERMES Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 12 | KARNAVAS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | GUMPRICH Joe P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 14 | MARKOWITZ Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 15 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | 100% | 51% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 16 | AUSTIN Truman | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | NANAYAKKARA Damin | 100% | 88% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 18 | AVILA Heru | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | KARASICK Andrew | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | LAND Evan | 100% | 95% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 21 | HAVERSON Civa | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 22 | LOTT Matt | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.