Fencing Institute of Texas, Inc. - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 1% | 27% | 71% |
2 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
3 | LEWIS Paul D. | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 79% |
3 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | - | - | 8% | 41% | 51% |
5 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | - | 1% | 22% | 77% |
6 | KIM Brian | 1% | 14% | 43% | 36% | 5% | - |
7 | REYES Omar | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% |
8 | TAN Christien | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 47% | 7% |
9 | KIM Adrian | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 8% | - |
10 | ANDRIC Borna | - | 1% | 19% | 64% | 15% | 1% |
11 | PARKER Isaiah | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - |
12 | RUFFNER Blake W. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 65% | 19% |
13 | POPOKH Leo | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 14% |
14 | MORA Johan | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
15 | LONG Quinton R. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 60% | 14% |
16 | CHENG Mason | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
17 | JOHNSON Chance | 4% | 44% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
18 | BARRETT Austin | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
19 | GÓMEZ CRUZ Francisco Javier | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
20 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 2% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 5% | - |
21 | CHEN Kelton | 3% | 28% | 55% | 13% | - | - |
22 | DAI Christopher | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
23 | LIU Michael H. | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
24 | MCKEE Calvin | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
25 | SENISCH Isaac | 20% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
26 | CARPENTER Demetrius | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - |
27 | GODFREY Christopher | 6% | 63% | 28% | 2% | - | - |
28 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
29 | MCCOY Camden | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
30 | SAUVAGE-SOUTHGATE Troy | 11% | 45% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.