NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOY LeeAnn | - | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% |
| 2 | WANG Zoe | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% | |
| 3 | SHU Youshan | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | |
| 3 | LI Fei | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 16% | |
| 5 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 6 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 51% | 13% |
| 8 | FENG Ge | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 9 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 10 | WANG Yumin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 11 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 58% |
| 12 | WANG Sophie Y. | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | ETZEL Rowan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 14 | WROBEL Julia | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - | |
| 15 | HE Lizbeth | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Michelle | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 18 | LI Olivia | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | PARSONS Mischa | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | SEREGIN Katya | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | KAUR Manroop | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | PAN Angela | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
| 25 | CHEN Jingyun | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 15% | 1% |
| 26 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | ROWLAND May | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 29 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 27% | 47% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 30 | FENG Iris | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ZHANG ANGELA | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | BRUNSON Nile | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 21% | 2% |
| 34 | CASHMAN Amanda | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | TRAN Helena | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 36 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 37 | WESER Veronica U. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
| 38 | THOMAS Meagan R. | 9% | 40% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | XIE Fiona | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | PATIL Amulya | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 43 | CHEN Alicia | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | GAVILANES Madyson | 27% | 47% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | CHANG Chloe | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | REISNER Gabriella | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | DENG Joy | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 50 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 51 | ZHENG Linden | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 52 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 53 | COLELLA Lauren | 8% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | LEE Hwaeun | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | BYRON Karen J. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 56 | FANG Kayla | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | < 1% | 1% | 6% | 27% | 49% | 17% |
| 59 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | SIZER Courtney | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | JENSEN MJ | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | ALVAREZ Letizia | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | GEFFNER Olivia | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.