Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCARPA Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 2 | ALVEAR Anibal | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | SHAFAIE Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 3 | PRINCE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 5 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 6 | O'BRIEN Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 5% |
| 7 | MAURER Ned | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 8 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 9 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 9% |
| 10 | LIU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% |
| 11 | AHN Jun | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 12 | VANNI Filippo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | MAGIDSON Gabe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 4% |
| 14 | GORDON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | SKINNER Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 16 | DESOLA Aidan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 18 | CHAMBERS Thomas | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 20 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | MAGIDSON Joshua | 100% | 79% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 22 | MONGRELLA John | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | MAYER Richard | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | VONA Elena | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 25 | MA Toby | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 26 | SCHAEFER Joshua | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | GORDON Rachel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 28 | SCHLOTTERBECK Abigail | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | SHREM Samuel | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | CRANS Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LI Richard | 100% | 81% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 32 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 93% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MASSEY Jonathan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | CLAPCICH Marco | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | REDDY Shiril | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.