The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
Maria Panyi (1), Andrey Geva (2), Igor Chirashnya (3), and Sue Moheb (4).

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 4:00 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TURCK Caspar J. - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
2 KANG Evan R. - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
3 MEHAN Nicholas - - - 1% 11% 38% 49%
3 NG Jonathan - - - 1% 11% 39% 48%
5 VAROQUA Nalby - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
6 GONG Jerry - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11%
7 KIM ELIJAH - - - - 4% 27% 69%
8 SUGIURA Samuel - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 29%
9 HUANG Alex F. - - - - 3% 25% 71%
10 KIM Ethan - - 1% 5% 21% 41% 32%
11 FELDMAN Drew - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 22%
12 URSU Marcel T. - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 33%
13 HUANG Alexander C. - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
14 CARRINGTON IV William T. - - 4% 16% 34% 33% 12%
15 BUIKEVICH Ihnat - 5% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
16 SADHU Neiyam 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
17 CHEN Jonathan - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 16%
18 LIU Kevin - - - 1% 10% 36% 53%
19 YAN William - 1% 12% 34% 39% 13%
20 CHUNG Connor - - 1% 4% 19% 41% 35%
21 LIM Brandon - 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 5%
22 GONG zihao - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 6%
23 LI Maxwell - 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 2%
24 HU Christopher - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
25 MUNJULURI Ruhaan 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
26 MANESCU Miron 1% 6% 21% 34% 28% 10% 1%
27 AYDOGDU Hakan - 6% 28% 40% 22% 4%
28 MCDONALD Finn 1% 8% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
29 ALAVE Kyle - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
30 SAGE Sebastian - 3% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
31 YOOK Isaac 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
32 ROSADO Sebastian 37% 45% 15% 2% - -
33 BIVIJI Ali - 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 5%
34 PEREIRA Beckham - 1% 8% 28% 38% 21% 3%
35 BADUSHOV Anton - - 3% 17% 40% 32% 7%
36 RYAN Kai - - 5% 19% 38% 30% 8%
37 MEYERSON Jacob - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
38 HENDERSON Lucas 2% 13% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
39 NG Timothy 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2%
40 BONETTI Brayden - 1% 6% 20% 35% 30% 9%
41 GUREVICH Savely - 3% 13% 29% 34% 18% 3%
42 SALDARINI Glenn - 2% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
43 CHAKRAVORTY Sohan 1% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5% -
44 SEN Christian 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 4% -
45 ZHAO Lucas - 1% 5% 20% 37% 31% 7%
46 GUREVICH Benjamin - 11% 35% 37% 15% 2%
47 LEE Andrew - 1% 7% 27% 43% 23%
48 DOMINIQUE Remson - 4% 16% 32% 31% 14% 2%
49 DEELY Hartigan 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
50 SUBA Lucas 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
51 WONG Caleb W. 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
52 KESSLER Nathan - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
53 LAMTAN Christoffer 2% 14% 37% 33% 13% 2% -
54 GONG ziqian 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
54 WANG Michael - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 2%
56 LIEBOWITZ Carson 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
57 HO Nathaniel 1% 15% 36% 32% 13% 2% -
58 GORDON Samuel 11% 32% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
58 LEE Anderson 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
60 CLARK Gabriel - 1% 6% 24% 39% 26% 5%
61 GAO Kai 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
62 HUANG Maxwell H. - 15% 39% 34% 11% 1%
63 SIMATOS Luka D. - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
64 DIGIACOMO Dennis G. 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
65 DOWNEY Baran - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
66 KOGAN Yelisey L. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
67 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
68 FADEL alexander - - 2% 13% 36% 37% 11%
69 BAI Evan - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
70 VILEMAITIS Tadas 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1% -
71 JONES Elijah 1% 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
72 EPLETT Nicholas 19% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
73 LIGH Checed 1% 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% -
74 MARKARYAN Eric 3% 19% 37% 30% 11% 1% -
75 KALOUDIS Sean 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
75 LIU Andrew 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
77 SARWAHI Viraat 2% 17% 34% 31% 13% 3% -
78 VUONG Kyle Ka-Him - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 2%
79 JIANG Terence 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
80 MARGULIS Jared - 20% 41% 29% 8% 1%
81 ZHAO Royce 1% 7% 28% 39% 21% 4%
82 REHM Liam - 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
83 STEVENS Flynn 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
84 ZHANG Ray 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% -
85 LOO Jason 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
86 YANG Si He 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
87 MERCHANT Milan - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
87 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
89 KETT Richard 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1% -
89 COGLIANO Max 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
91 NAYAK Surin K. 1% 9% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
92 ZHAO Martin 39% 43% 15% 2% - - -
93 WANG tiger 8% 34% 37% 17% 3% - -
94 NARDINI Nathanael P. - 1% 8% 26% 40% 23% 2%
95 BECKWITH Charlie 8% 29% 36% 20% 6% 1% -
96 RILEY "Jack" 9% 31% 36% 18% 4% - -
96 LI Coby 4% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
98 FENG Brendan 4% 28% 39% 22% 6% 1% -
99 LIU Ryan 3% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
100 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas 1% 7% 21% 33% 27% 10% 1%
101 BAHK Caleb 14% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
102 VAHABZADEH Jake R. 18% 44% 29% 8% 1% - -
103 LIU Alexander 29% 45% 21% 4% - - -
104 ZISLIN Benjamin 26% 46% 23% 5% 1% - -
105 JI Johnson 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
106 JANUS Maksymilian 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
107 LAZARTE Gabriel 96% 4% - - - -
108 SAYAR Luke 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
108 SUN Andrew 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
110 CHIEN Nolan 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
111 YANG Byron 26% 49% 21% 4% - -
112 ANSARI Umayr 44% 40% 14% 2% - - -
113 JAIN Karanvir 38% 41% 17% 3% - - -
113 KHOTLINE Daniel 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
113 ZWAKA Jonas 43% 41% 14% 2% - - -
116 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket 46% 39% 13% 2% - - -
117 ENGERRAN Michael 66% 29% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.