The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, November 26, 2023 at 4:00 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 TURCK Caspar J. V D V V V V V V V V V V 4.1 4 -0.1
2 KANG Evan R. V D D D V V V V V V V V D 5.1 3 -2.1
3 MEHAN Nicholas V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 NG Jonathan V V V V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
5 VAROQUA Nalby V V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
6 GONG Jerry V V D V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
7 KIM ELIJAH V V V D V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
8 SUGIURA Samuel D D V D V V V V V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
9 HUANG Alex F. V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
10 KIM Ethan V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
11 FELDMAN Drew V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
12 URSU Marcel T. V V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
13 HUANG Alexander C. V V V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
14 CARRINGTON IV William T. V V V D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
15 BUIKEVICH Ihnat V D D V V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
16 SADHU Neiyam D D V V V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
17 CHEN Jonathan V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
18 LIU Kevin V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
19 YAN William V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
20 CHUNG Connor V V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
21 LIM Brandon V V D V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
22 GONG zihao V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
23 LI Maxwell V V D V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
24 HU Christopher V V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
25 MUNJULURI Ruhaan V V V V D V V V D 2.2 5 +2.8
26 MANESCU Miron V D V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
27 AYDOGDU Hakan V V D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
28 MCDONALD Finn V V V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
29 ALAVE Kyle D V V V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
30 SAGE Sebastian D D V D V V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
31 YOOK Isaac D D D V D V V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
32 ROSADO Sebastian D D V D D V V D 0.8 1 +0.2
33 BIVIJI Ali V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
34 PEREIRA Beckham V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
35 BADUSHOV Anton V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
36 RYAN Kai D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
37 MEYERSON Jacob D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
38 HENDERSON Lucas V V V V D D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
39 NG Timothy V V D D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
40 BONETTI Brayden V V V V D D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
41 GUREVICH Savely D V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
42 SALDARINI Glenn D V V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
43 CHAKRAVORTY Sohan D D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
44 SEN Christian V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
45 ZHAO Lucas V D V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
46 GUREVICH Benjamin V V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
47 LEE Andrew D V V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
48 DOMINIQUE Remson D V V V D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
49 DEELY Hartigan D V V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 SUBA Lucas V D V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
51 WONG Caleb W. D D V V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
52 KESSLER Nathan D V D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
53 LAMTAN Christoffer V D D V V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
54 GONG ziqian D D V D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
54 WANG Michael D D V V D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
56 LIEBOWITZ Carson D D D V V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
57 HO Nathaniel V V D D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
58 GORDON Samuel D D D V D V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
58 LEE Anderson V V D D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
60 CLARK Gabriel D D V D V D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
61 GAO Kai D V D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
62 HUANG Maxwell H. D D D V D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
63 SIMATOS Luka D. D D D V D D V D 3.2 1 -2.2
64 DIGIACOMO Dennis G. V D D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
65 DOWNEY Baran V D V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
66 KOGAN Yelisey L. V V D D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
67 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary D V V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
68 FADEL alexander D V V D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
69 BAI Evan D D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
70 VILEMAITIS Tadas V V V V D D D 2.2 4 +1.8
71 JONES Elijah V V V V D D D 3.0 4 +1.0
72 EPLETT Nicholas V D V V V D D 1.4 4 +2.6
73 LIGH Checed V D V D D V D 3.0 3 -
74 MARKARYAN Eric D V V V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
75 KALOUDIS Sean D D V V V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
75 LIU Andrew V V D D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
77 SARWAHI Viraat V D D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
78 VUONG Kyle Ka-Him V V V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
79 JIANG Terence V D D D V V D 1.2 3 +1.8
80 MARGULIS Jared D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
81 ZHAO Royce V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
82 REHM Liam D D V D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
83 STEVENS Flynn V D D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
84 ZHANG Ray D V D D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
85 LOO Jason D V D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 YANG Si He D V D D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
87 MERCHANT Milan D V D V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
87 PAVLENISHVILI Luke V D D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
89 KETT Richard D V V D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
89 COGLIANO Max V D V D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
91 NAYAK Surin K. V D D V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
92 ZHAO Martin D V D D D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
93 WANG tiger D V D V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
94 NARDINI Nathanael P. D D D D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
95 BECKWITH Charlie D V D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
96 RILEY "Jack" D D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
96 LI Coby D D D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
98 FENG Brendan D D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
99 LIU Ryan D D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
100 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas V D D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
101 BAHK Caleb D V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
102 VAHABZADEH Jake R. V D D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
103 LIU Alexander D D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
104 ZISLIN Benjamin D V D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
105 JI Johnson D D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
106 JANUS Maksymilian D D D D D D D 3.0 0 -3.0
107 LAZARTE Gabriel D D D D D D 0.0 0 -
108 SAYAR Luke D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
108 SUN Andrew D D D D D D D 2.4 0 -2.4
110 CHIEN Nolan D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
111 YANG Byron D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
112 ANSARI Umayr D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
113 JAIN Karanvir D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
113 KHOTLINE Daniel D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
113 ZWAKA Jonas D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
116 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
117 ENGERRAN Michael D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.