Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 2 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 3 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 5 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% |
| 6 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% | |
| 7 | GHAYALOD reya | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 8 | XIAO julie | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 9 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 9 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 12% |
| 11 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 12 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 13 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 14 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% |
| 15 | MELNYCHUK Yelyzaveta | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 16 | LEE Hannah | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 55% | 15% |
| 18 | KONG Vera | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 19 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 20 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | DRAGON Rainer | - | - | 5% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 3% |
| 22 | BROWN Emma | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 23 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 8% |
| 24 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 25 | LI Victoria J. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | MUND Ruth | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 43% | 6% |
| 29 | LI Amanda C. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | KHAN Alissa | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 33 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 52% |
| 34 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% |
| 35 | SAYLES Nina R. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 3% |
| 36 | CHEN Ashley | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LIN Nicole | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 39 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 40 | NATH Trisha | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 41 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | WANG Elysia | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | KIM Marley I. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | KOLMYKOVA Aleksandra | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 46 | WU Helen | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | YUCEL Emine I. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 48 | JOHNSON Honor | - | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 29% | 69% |
| 49 | MAKLIN Sofia | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% |
| 51 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 28% | 67% |
| 52 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 53 | FEIG Sela | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Sophie | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHANG XUANYI | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | LU Elaine | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 60 | LIGH Erenei J. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 61 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 62 | MCKEE Brynnley | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 63 | JOHNSON Lydia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 64 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 65 | PAUL Lila | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 66 | LEE Sophia | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | DUCKETT Madison | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 68 | COLTER Aurora | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | FAVO Isabella | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 71 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 72 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 73 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 74 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 74 | YANG Lea | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 76 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | CHIANG Melissa | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | ZHANG Chenfei | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | PRIEUR Lauren | 10% | 29% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 80 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 81 | SCOTT Eve | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | FESTA Carina | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 83 | YAO Rainie | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | LIU Yifei | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 85 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 86 | GRAFF Sophie | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 86 | MARYASH Samantha | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 88 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 89 | CHAVAN Arya | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 92 | HENRY Soraya S. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | JEONG Katie | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 94 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | DONG Angel | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | GLUCK Myriam | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | MANSPERGER Leena | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 99 | NGUYEN Siena | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 99 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | HE Charlotte | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% | |
| 102 | XU Emily T. | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.